Unbelievable. Nurses at a Medical Facility in North Texas were regularly directed to, “Make this patient go bye-bye” by the owner. Click Here for local coverage on the full story.
We cannot stand for this. Join the fight for life today by becoming a member.
A victory abroad is a victory for us. More and more we are faced with cultural battles that are reflected as legal ones, and whenever a legal battle is won- even in another country- we have reason to celebrate.
Dr. Josef Schuster, president of the German Council of Jew in Germany led the charge in “a long, serious and sometimes emotional debate” that ended with a bill being passed that actually toughens the country’s stance on the issue, punishing doctors who still encourage the practice. [More on the Bill Here]
Victories like this can encourage us to continue fighting unjust practices such as assisted suicide here at home too. Find out how you can get involved by filling out our contact form below!
We’ve compiled a list of California’s Representatives, Senators and Assembly Legislators and their voting records on Life Issues. Use the legend below to find out how your representative responds to the following three questions:
[Y=Yes] [N=No] [?=Unclear Position] [NR=No Response]
The Column on the far right is how often they vote in with Planned Parenthood. 0% indicates a perfect pro-life voting record, while 100% indicates a perfect Planned Parenthood voting record.
|
|
|
|
This vote took place during “Extraordinary Session” 2015 which was called to address Medi-Cal costs.
MEASURE: ABX2 15
AUTHOR: Eggman
TOPIC: End of life.
DATE: 09/09/2015
LOCATION: ASM. FLOOR
MOTION: AB 15 EGGMAN Assembly Third Reading Second Extraordinary Session
(AYES 44. NOES 35.) (PASS)
AYES
****
Alejo Baker Bloom Bonilla
Bonta Burke Calderon Campos
Chau Chiu Chu Cooley
Cooper Dababneh Dodd Eggman
Frazier Cristina Garcia Eduardo Garcia Gatto
Gomez Gordon Gray Hadley
Holden Irwin Jones-Sawyer Levine
Low Maienschein McCarty Medina
Mullin Nazarian Perea Quirk
Rendon Salas Mark Stone Thurmond
Ting Weber Wood Atkins
NOES
****
Achadjian Travis Allen Bigelow Brough
Brown Chang Chávez Dahle
Beth Gaines Gallagher Gipson Gonzalez
Grove Harper Roger Hernández Jones
Kim Lackey Linder Lopez
Mathis Mayes Melendez Obernolte
O’Donnell Olsen Patterson Ridley-Thomas
Rodriguez Santiago Steinorth Wagner
Waldron Wilk Williams
ABSENT, ABSTAINING, OR NOT VOTING
*********************************
Daly
This is the Senate Vote:
UNOFFICIAL BALLOT
MEASURE: ABX2 15
AUTHOR: Eggman
TOPIC: End of life.
DATE: 09/11/2015
LOCATION: SEN. FLOOR
MOTION: Assembly 3rd Reading AB15 Eggman By Wolk and Monning
(AYES 23. NOES 15.) (PASS)
AYES
****
Allen Beall Block De León
Galgiani Glazer Hall Hancock
Hernandez Hertzberg Hill Jackson
Lara Leno Leyva Liu
McGuire Mitchell Monning Pavley
Roth Wieckowski Wolk
NOES
****
Anderson Bates Berryhill Cannella
Gaines Huff Mendoza Moorlach
Morrell Nguyen Nielsen Runner
Stone Vidak Fuller
NO VOTE RECORDED
****************
Hueso Pan
Should ‘medicine’ be free to use humans as it wishes?
Mary Shelley, still in her teens, was challenged by her friends to write a scary story. Yes, she won the bet. (A promising sign, when your competitor/friends are Lord Byron and Percy Shelley!) Her book depicted what would happen to medical ethics if it was blindly and blithely seen as a tool of the industrial revolution: Scientism. It is the ethical idea that if something could technically be done using scientific tools then it ‘should be done’. Scientism is the belief that science creates its own ethical rules.
Her book, “Frankenstein” riveted the Western world and continues to echo in this day. The recent revelation of Planned Parenthood’s ‘production’ of human organs on demand (‘Livers? Oh, Yes; get lots of orders for livers, and hearts and lungs.’)
For some reason the Director of Medical Services for PP felt she needed to admit that intact brains are a bit tougher. They have to crush the skull you know.
But somethings just never change. Everyone remembers it was Fredric Frankenstein, the Doctor who was the real perpetrator, the ethical monster. And even he had procurement challenges.. “A brain.. Igor. I still need a brain”.
PP and the abortion industry at-large are handsomely funded by the government, and particularly here in California by the state government. The state in many ways serves the abortion industry, and not its actual citizens or their values.
We will not soon ‘change the mind’ of perpetrators like PP’s ‘physicians’ or other Dr. Fredric Frankensteins. But there are those who facilitate, who help, who co-ordinate with resources, (and by resources I mean our tax money); like the State of California, PP’s favorite “Igor”. Well according to the state constitution, the state is supposed to be working for us, its citizens, not the blood crazed who hide behind a ‘false science’ those who kill on request via ‘medicine’, who sell the human organs, ‘for science’.
Government helping, facilitating, serving such twisted science is the improper place of government.
We must stop the government funding of such evil enterprises.
No Igor. You are not to do such things. You work for us.
The public may be surprised to learn that the largest chain of abortion clinics, Planned Parenthood, would ever recognize the need for parental involvement in the lives of children. It is true Planned Parenthood has spent tens of millions of dollars fighting parental involvement laws and initiatives. However, Planned Parenthood of the Southwest makes it clear that children under 18 need parental permission to participate in the upcoming…..Lobby Day. To be fair, Planned Parenthood isn’t flip-flopping. Planned Parenthood still zealously supports keeping secrets from parents about surgical, chemical or drug-induced abortions that could lead to medical complications or death for their children, and of course, death to their grandchildren. Nothing wrong with that, they say. But Planned Parenthood knows parents have the right to know about potentially dangerous activities like Planned Parenthood Lobby Day, where of course, children may be used to oppose parental rights.
Dangerous Bill Being Snuck Through!California’s SB 1095 would Result in Harm and Death for the Unborn
California’s SB 1095 would result in expansion of genetic screening, so that CA would be required to screen for “any (…) disease detectable in blood samples” – not only after birth, but in the words of the bill, as part of “prenatal care” – prior to the child having the opportunity to be born. The bill proposes that the “diseases” which would be funded for screening and ultimate exclusion from the gene pool would be decided upon by a Federal RUSP – a panel of persons that nobody in the State of California can influence or control.
Legislators sneakily brought the bill off of suspense, and passed it out of Assembly Appropriations Committee on August 11, 2016. (The bill has passed Senate and is now on its Second Reading in the Assembly.)
This bill proposes an unlimited expenditure of funds, that would grow over time. I quote from the bill, which proposes an “expenditure of funds from the Genetic Disease Testing Fund for the expansion of the Genetic Disease Branch Screening Information System to include (…) any (…) disease that is detectable in blood samples.”
Read that carefully: “any (…) disease that is detectable in blood samples.” The effects of this screening and what will ultimately be a California effort at ‘negative eugenics’ will grow – causing untold harm to billions.
This bill would cause billions to be screened out of the gene pool either as a result of aggressive genetic counseling, recommendations for genetic modification, or abortion.
Please schedule online advocacy action to stop this bill. It appears that the bill is being rushed to passage out of the Assembly; it may be that the best way to stop the bill would be to write the Governor to ask that SB 1095 be vetoed when it arrives at his desk.
The Governor’s mailing address is:
Governor Jerry Brown
c/o State Capitol, Suite 1173
Sacramento, CA 95814
Alternatively, he can be contacted online at:
https://govnews.gov.ca.gov/ gov39mail/mail.php
Special thanks to Colin Gallagher
——–
These other bills are currently circulating through the Legislature. It is important that your voice be heard regarding these issues that impact our families and our culture.
Make sure to use the link provided to find and contact your representatives and tell them oppose or support these bills!
AB 2531 – offers payments to young women for the sale of their eggs. These are then used in IVF, cloning and human experimentation. By its very nature, IVF requires the destruction of fertilized embryos. Please follow progress and contact YOUR legislator
AB 1671 This bill would prohibit David Daleiden type reportage on Planned Parenthood, offering it special protections.
AB 775 –Pregnancy Care Center Discrimination and “Gag” Rule (Chiu) –
This Bill is currently under court challenge.
This bill mandates a statement all Pregnancy Care Centers would have to tell mothers seeking care that includes how to get an abortion but not alternatives like adoption. It also exempts abortion clinics from giving the same mothers the same information.
California’s Pregnancy Resource Centers offer ‘competition’ to the abortion industry. We need to make sure that they are able to offer the support and answers that women deserve!
You can assist our amicus brief legal fund here.
SB 277 – Mandated Childhood Vaccines Intrude on Parental Rights (Pan) –
This bill strives to eliminate the personal belief exemption option from the school immunization law forcing parents to vaccinate their children from all diseases deemed necessary by the Department of Public Health (DPH). Some immunizations use tissue from aborted babies.
Based on false ‘science’, SB 277 makes sweeping claims to government authority over all California’s children. It will not allow substitute vaccines, and the moral, ethical, and scientific questions surrounding certain immunizations are not to be respected.
We are filing an amicus brief in the lawsuit filed Aug.12 that challenges its constitutionality. You can assist us here.
Because of the high risk of encouraging suicide amongst the vulnerable, international media ethics prescribe careful guidelines for coverage of every suicide. Of particular import: the instructions not to sensationalize or romaticize the suicidal act, not to offer the ‘justifying reasons’ or publish the suicide note or statements of the individual killed. All of that is now out the window in California.
Billionaire and culture-warrior, George Soros has given millions to ‘Compassion and Choices’ (C&C) to help them influence culture, then pass and implement assisted suicide laws across the nation.
The tragedy of a young California woman, Brittany Maynard, is the principle vehicle used by C&C (formerly known as the Hemlock Society) to carry this message of ‘compassionate’ killing. Simultaneous stories in People Magazine, and in every newspaper in the nation announced her ‘declaration’ to take her own life on November 1st, 2014.
Many individuals have faced illnesses similar to Brittany’s brain cancer, and lived for years. Amazingly, the day prior to “D Day” Nov 1, Brittany announced that she too would like to put it off a bit longer. Something or someone influenced Brittany to ‘get back on schedule’ and she did indeed die of poisoning on Nov 1.
While supposedly ‘private’, this was one of the most public ‘self-killings’ of recent times.
It was clear then and even clearer on Weds. March 25th, that many others were directly involved in both Brittany’s care and and the promulgation of her final decision. A Compassion in Choices media team had recorded numerous videos of Brittany, her husband and parents as they emotionally agitated for a change in California law. These video pleas and personal testimony were repeated for California’s Senate Committee on Health and hundreds of proponents and opponents lined up to state their position.
But the mediagenic nature of Brittany’s lethal decision was clearly front and center.
The California Senate Health Committee, after watching Brittany’s ‘good by’ video and hearing emotional testimony by those who seek to remove the law against third-party involvement in suicide (“assisting suicide”) as well as considerable countervailing documentation of killing of the non-terminal, doctor shopping and manipulated suicide by heirs, voted SB 128 out and on to the Judiciary Committee.
It is expected to be heard in Senate Judiciary in April.
Here is the Senate Health Committee membership with links.
Please let your Senator know of your care or concern for their vote.
Senators Richard Roth, Wolk, Hernandez, Hall, Mitchell and Monning supported suicide
Senators Nielsen and Nguyen opposed.
Senator Pan abstained.
